CIPP-E퍼펙트덤프데모다운로드 - CIPP-E시험유효덤프

다년간 IT업계에 종사하신 전문가들이 자신의 노하우와 경험으로 제작한 IAPP CIPP-E덤프는 CIPP-E 실제 기출문제를 기반으로 한 자료로서 CIPP-E시험문제의 모든 범위와 유형을 포함하고 있어 높을 적중율을 자랑하고 있습니다.덤프구매후 불합격 받으시면 구매일로부터 60일내 주문은 덤프비용을 환불해드립니다.IT 자격증 취득은 Itcertkr덤프가 정답입니다.

CIPP/E 인증 시험은 GDPR의 법적 프레임 워크, 데이터 컨트롤러 및 프로세서의 역할 및 책임, 데이터 보호 영향 평가, 데이터 주제 권한 및 국경 간 데이터 전송을 포함하여 광범위한 주제를 다룹니다. 시험에 합격하는 개인은 GDPR에 대한 이해와 원칙을 실제 상황에 적용하는 능력을 보여줍니다. 이 인증은 전 세계적으로 개인 정보 보호 전문가를위한 주요 자격 증명으로 인정되며 다양한 산업 분야의 고용주가 많이 인기를 얻고 있습니다.

>> CIPP-E퍼펙트 덤프데모 다운로드 <<

시험준비에 가장 좋은 CIPP-E퍼펙트 덤프데모 다운로드 최신버전 덤프샘플 문제

Itcertkr는IAPP인증CIPP-E시험에 대하여 가이드를 해줄 수 있는 사이트입니다. Itcertkr는 여러분의 전업지식을 업그레이드시켜줄 수 잇고 또한 한번에IAPP인증CIPP-E시험을 패스하도록 도와주는 사이트입니다. Itcertkr제공하는 자료들은 모두 it업계전문가들이 자신의 지식과 끈임없은 경헌등으로 만들어낸 퍼펙트 자료들입니다. 품질은 정확도 모두 보장되는 문제집입니다.IAPP인증CIPP-E시험은 여러분이 it지식을 한층 업할수 잇는 시험이며 우리 또한 일년무료 업데이트서비스를 제공합니다.

최신 Certified Information Privacy Professional CIPP-E 무료샘플문제 (Q252-Q257):

질문 # 252
What is a reason the European Court of Justice declared the Data Retention Directive invalid in 2014?

A. The requirements had limitations on how national authorities could use data.
B. The requirements affected individuals without exception.
C. The requirements were financially burdensome to EU businesses.
D. The requirements specified that data must be held within the EU.

정답：B

설명：
The Data Retention Directive was a EU law that required providers of electronic communications services to retain certain data, such as traffic and location data, for a period of between six months and two years, for the purpose of preventing, investigating, detecting and prosecuting serious crime1. However, in 2014, the Court of Justice of the European Union declared the Directive invalid, because it violated the fundamental rights to respect for private life and to the protection of personal data, as enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU2. The Court found that the Directive entailed a wide-ranging and particularly serious interference with those rights, without being limited to what is strictly necessary3. One of the reasons for this finding was that the Directive applied to all individuals, all means of electronic communication and all traffic data without any differentiation, limitation or exception, thus affecting the entire population of the EU4. The Court also noted that the Directive did not provide sufficient safeguards to ensure effective protection of the data against the risk of abuse and unlawful access, and did not require the data to be retained within the EU5. References: 1 Directive 2006/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the retention of data generated or processed in connection with the provision of publicly available electronic communications services or of public communications networks and amending Directive 2002/58
/EC2 Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union3 Press release No 54/14 - Judgment in Joined Cases C-293/12 and C-594/12 Digital Rights Ireland and Seitlinger and Others4 Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 April 2014. Digital Rights Ireland Ltd v Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources and Others and Karntner Landesregierung and Others. Requests for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland) and the Verfassungsgerichtshof (Austria). Joined cases C-293/12 and C-594
/125 Ibid.

질문 # 253
SCENARIO
Please use the following to answer the next question:
ABC Hotel Chain and XYZ Travel Agency are U.S.-based multinational companies. They use an internet- based common platform for collecting and sharing their customer data with each other, in order to integrate their marketing efforts. Additionally, they agree on the data to be stored, how reservations will be booked and confirmed, and who has access to the stored data.
Mike, an EU resident, has booked travel itineraries in the past through XYZ Travel Agency to stay at ABC Hotel Chain's locations. XYZ Travel Agency offers a rewards program that allows customers to sign up to accumulate points that can later be redeemed for free travel. Mike has signed the agreement to be a rewards program member.
Now Mike wants to know what personal information the company holds about him. He sends an email requesting access to his data, in order to exercise what he believes are his data subject rights.
What are ABC Hotel Chain and XYZ Travel Agency's roles in this relationship?

A. ABC Hotel Chain and XYZ Travel Agency are independent controllers.
B. ABC Hotel Chain is the controller and XYZ Travel Agency is the processor.
C. XYZ Travel Agency is the controller and ABC Hotel Chain is the processor.
D. ABC Hotel Chain and XYZ Travel Agency are joint controllers.

정답：D

설명：
ABC Hotel Chain and XYZ Travel Agency are joint controllers in this relationship, because they jointly determine the purposes and means of the processing of personal data of their customers. According to Article
26 of the GDPR, joint controllers are two or more controllers who jointly participate in the decision-making process regarding the processing of personal data 1. In this scenario, ABC Hotel Chain and XYZ Travel Agency use a common platform for collecting and sharing customer data, and they agree on the data to be stored, how reservations will be booked and confirmed, and who has access to the stored data. Therefore, they have a common influence on the processing of personal data and share a common objective of integrating their marketing efforts. Moreover, they offer a rewards program that allows customers to sign up to accumulate points that can be redeemed for free travel, which implies a joint benefit from the processing of personal data.
The other options are not correct because they do not reflect the actual roles of ABC Hotel Chain and XYZ Travel Agency in this relationship. A controller is a natural or legal person who alone or jointly with others determines the purposes and means of the processing of personal data 2. A processor is a natural or legal person who processes personal data on behalf of the controller 3. In this scenario, neither ABC Hotel Chain nor XYZ Travel Agency act solely or on behalf of the other in processing the personal data of their customers.
Rather, they act together in a collaborative manner and share the responsibility and accountability for the processing of personal data. Therefore, they are joint controllers, not independent controllers or controller and processor. References: 1: Article 26 of the GDPR 2: Article 4(7) of the GDPR 3: Article 4(8) of the GDPR

질문 # 254
Which of the following is NOT considered a fair processing practice in relation to the transparency principle?

A. Providing a "just-in-time" contextual pop-up privacy notice, in an online application from field.
B. Providing a QR code linking to more detailed privacy notice, in a CCTV sign.
C. Providing a multi-layered privacy notice, in a website environment.
D. Providing a hyperlink to the organization's home page, in a hard copy application form.

정답：D

설명：
According to the transparency principle, data controllers must provide clear and transparent information to data subjects about how their personal data is processed. This information must be easily accessible and easy to understand. Providing a hyperlink to the organization's home page, in a hard copy application form, is not considered a fair processing practice in relation to the transparency principle, because it does not directly inform the data subject about the specific purposes and legal basis of the processing, the data protection rights and obligations, and the contact details of the data controller and the data protection officer. This information should be provided in a concise, intelligible and easily accessible form, using clear and plain language, in a way that is appropriate to the means of communication. Providing a hyperlink to the organization's home page, in a hard copy application form, does not meet these criteria and may also be inaccessible to some data subjects who do not have internet access or are not familiar with the use of hyperlinks. Therefore, this option is not a fair processing practice in relation to the transparency principle. References: 1234 https://ico.org.uk
/for-organisations/direct-marketing-and-privacy-and-electronic-communications/guidance-for-the-use-of- personal-data-in-political-campaigning-1/lawful-fair-and-transparent-processing/ https://ico.org.uk/for- organisations/direct-marketing-and-privacy-and-electronic-communications/guidance-for-the-use-of-personal- data-in-political-campaigning-1/lawful-fair-and-transparent-processing/

질문 # 255
SCENARIO
Please use the following to answer the next question:
Anna and Frank both work at Granchester University. Anna is a lawyer responsible for data protection, while Frank is a lecturer in the engineering department. The University maintains a number of types of records:
Student records, including names, student numbers, home addresses, pre-university information, university attendance and performance records, details of special educational needs and financial information.
Staff records, including autobiographical materials (such as curricula, professional contact files, student evaluations and other relevant teaching files).
Alumni records, including birthplaces, years of birth, dates of matriculation and conferrals of degrees. These records are available to former students after registering through Granchester's Alumni portal. Department for Education records, showing how certain demographic groups (such as first-generation students) could be expected, on average, to progress. These records do not contain names or identification numbers.
Under their security policy, the University encrypts all of its personal data records in transit and at rest.
In order to improve his teaching, Frank wants to investigate how his engineering students perform in relational to Department for Education expectations. He has attended one of Anna's data protection training courses and knows that he should use no more personal data than necessary to accomplish his goal. He creates a program that will only export some student data: previous schools attended, grades originally obtained, grades currently obtained and first time university attended. He wants to keep the records at the individual student level. Mindful of Anna's training, Frank runs the student numbers through an algorithm to transform them into different reference numbers. He uses the same algorithm on each occasion so that he can update each record over time.
One of Anna's tasks is to complete the record of processing activities, as required by the GDPR. After receiving her email reminder, as required by the GDPR. After receiving her email reminder, Frank informs Anna about his performance database.
Ann explains to Frank that, as well as minimizing personal data, the University has to check that this new use of existing data is permissible. She also suspects that, under the GDPR, a risk analysis may have to be carried out before the data processing can take place. Anna arranges to discuss this further with Frank after she has done some additional research.
Frank wants to be able to work on his analysis in his spare time, so he transfers it to his home laptop (which is not encrypted). Unfortunately, when Frank takes the laptop into the University he loses it on the train. Frank has to see Anna that day to discuss compatible processing. He knows that he needs to report security incidents, so he decides to tell Anna about his lost laptop at the same time.
Which of the University's records does Anna NOT have to include in her record of processing activities?

A. Frank's performance database
B. Department for Education records
C. Staff and alumni records
D. Student records

정답：A

설명：
According to the GDPR, a record of processing activities (RoPA) is a document that provides an overview of how personal data is processed within an organisation. It must include information on the types of personal data processed, the purposes for which the data is processed, and the measures taken to ensure the security of the data123. A RoPA must be kept up to date and made available to the supervisory authority upon request1.
In this scenario, Anna does not have to include Frank's performance database in her RoPA, because it does not contain any personal data. Personal data is any information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person4. Frank's performance database only contains aggregated or anonymised data that cannot identify any individual student. Therefore, it does not fall under the definition of personal data under the GDPR.
However, Anna still has to complete her RoPA for all other types of records that are processed by Granchester University, such as student records, staff and alumni records, and Department for Education records. These records may contain personal data that needs to be minimised and protected in accordance with the GDPR principles4. Anna also has to conduct a risk analysis before processing these records, as required by Article 35(2) of the GDPR4. She also has to report any security incidents involving these records, as required by Article 33(3) of the GDPR4.
Reference:
[Art. 30 GDPR - Records of processing activities]
[How do we document our processing activities?]
Records of Processing (Article 30) Guidance
GDPR Records of Processing Activities | Resources
Records of Processing Activities: A Key GDPR Compliance Requirement

질문 # 256
SCENARIO
Please use the following to answer the next question:
Javier is a member of the fitness club EVERFIT. This company has branches in many EU member states, but for the purposes of the GDPR maintains its primary establishment in France. Javier lives in Newry, Northern Ireland (part of the U.K.), and commutes across the border to work in Dundalk, Ireland. Two years ago while on a business trip, Javier was photographed while working out at a branch of EVERFIT in Frankfurt, Germany. At the time, Javier gave his consent to being included in the photograph, since he was told that it would be used for promotional purposes only. Since then, the photograph has been used in the club's U.K. brochures, and it features in the landing page of its U.K. website. However, the fitness club has recently fallen into disrepute due to widespread mistreatment of members at various branches of the club in several EU member states. As a result, Javier no longer feels comfortable with his photograph being publicly associated with the fitness club.
After numerous failed attempts to book an appointment with the manager of the local branch to discuss this matter, Javier sends a letter to EVETFIT requesting that his image be removed from the website and all promotional materials. Months pass and Javier, having received no acknowledgment of his request, becomes very anxious about this matter. After repeatedly failing to contact EVETFIT through alternate channels, he decides to take action against the company.
Javier contacts the U.K. Information Commissioner's Office ('ICO' - the U.K.'s supervisory authority) to lodge a complaint about this matter. The ICO, pursuant to Article 56 (3) of the GDPR, informs the CNIL (i.e. the supervisory authority of EVERFIT's main establishment) about this matter. Despite the fact that EVERFIT has an establishment in the U.K., the CNIL decides to handle the case in accordance with Article 60 of the GDPR. The CNIL liaises with the ICO, as relevant under the cooperation procedure. In light of issues amongst the supervisory authorities to reach a decision, the European Data Protection Board becomes involved and, pursuant to the consistency mechanism, issues a binding decision.
Additionally, Javier sues EVERFIT for the damages caused as a result of its failure to honor his request to have his photograph removed from the brochure and website.
Assuming that multiple EVETFIT branches across several EU countries are acting as separate data controllers, and that each of those branches were responsible for mishandling Javier's request, how may Javier proceed in order to seek compensation?

A. He will have to sue each EVETFIT branch so that each branch provides proportionate compensation commensurate with its contribution to the damage or distress suffered by Javier.
B. He will be able to sue any one of the relevant EVETFIT branches, as each one may be held liable for the entire damage.
C. He will be able to apply to the European Data Protection Board in order to determine which particular EVETFIT branch is liable for damages, based on the decision that was made by the board.
D. He will have to sue the EVETFIT's head office in France, where EVETFIT has its main establishment.

정답：D

질문 # 257
......

이 산업에는 아주 많은 비슷한 회사들이 있습니다, 그러나 Itcertkr는 다른 회사들이 이룩하지 못한 독특한 이점을 가지고 있습니다. Pss4Test IAPP CIPP-E덤프를 결제하면 바로 사이트에서IAPP CIPP-E덤프를 다운받을수 있고 구매한IAPP CIPP-E시험이 종료되고 다른 코드로 변경되면 변경된 코드로 된 덤프가 출시되면 비용추가없이 새로운 덤프를 제공해드립니다.

CIPP-E시험유효덤프: https://www.itcertkr.com/CIPP-E_exam.html

Itcertkr CIPP-E시험유효덤프제품을 한번 믿어보세요, 통계에 따르면 대부분 IT기업에서 IAPP CIPP-E자격증을 취득한 인재를 필요로 한다고 합니다, IAPP인증 CIPP-E시험은 IT인증시험중 가장 인기있는 국제승인 자격증을 취득하는데서의 필수시험과목입니다.그만큼 시험문제가 어려워 시험도전할 용기가 없다구요, Itcertkr의 전문가들은IAPP CIPP-E 최신시험문제를 연구하여 시험대비에 딱 맞는IAPP CIPP-E덤프를 출시하였습니다, Itcertkr CIPP-E시험유효덤프는 믿을 수 있는 사이트입니다.

저 배우의 악마를 잡으러 갑시다, 그의 집에 세들어 살고 있다고 했으니 그녀의 집은 곧 그의 부모가 사는 집이었다, Itcertkr제품을 한번 믿어보세요, 통계에 따르면 대부분 IT기업에서 IAPP CIPP-E자격증을 취득한 인재를 필요로 한다고 합니다.

시험패스 가능한 CIPP-E퍼펙트 덤프데모 다운로드 최신버전 문제

IAPP인증 CIPP-E시험은 IT인증시험중 가장 인기있는 국제승인 자격증을 취득하는데서의 필수시험과목입니다.그만큼 시험문제가 어려워 시험도전할 용기가 없다구요, Itcertkr의 전문가들은IAPP CIPP-E 최신시험문제를 연구하여 시험대비에 딱 맞는IAPP CIPP-E덤프를 출시하였습니다.

Itcertkr는 믿을 수 있는 사이트입니다.

Limited time offer: Flat 30% discount on all courses Enroll Now

Our Blog

Tony Davis Tony Davis

Biography

CIPP-E퍼펙트덤프데모다운로드 - CIPP-E시험유효덤프

시험준비에 가장 좋은 CIPP-E퍼펙트 덤프데모 다운로드 최신버전 덤프샘플 문제

최신 Certified Information Privacy Professional CIPP-E 무료샘플문제 (Q252-Q257):

시험패스 가능한 CIPP-E퍼펙트 덤프데모 다운로드 최신버전 문제